Red Lights Ahead for Green Projects

Bill Opalka | Jul 01, 2011

Share/Save  

 

The push hasn’t come hard or fast enough. For all the talk about getting more renewable energy projects going on federal lands, the policies in place don’t move projects to the industry’s liking.

That seemed to be the consensus at a recent hearing of the U.S. House Natural Resources Committee hearing, "American Energy Initiative: Identifying Roadblocks to Wind and Solar Energy on Public Lands and Waters."
 
The amount of time a project can be delayed by its opposition is one of the complaints. At 11 years and counting before the Cape Wind offshore project in Massachusetts ever gets going, developer Jim Gordon is an expert o the topic.

“One fundamental defect is that it lacks any legal requirements that would limit the duration of the review period,” Gordon said. “As a result, with no required end point, opponents can use regulatory stalling and delay tactics to try to financially cripple even a project that meets all statutory standards and serves federal and state policy objectives.”

Gordon suggested a three-pronged approach to move projects through the permitting pipeline:

- Environmental review pursuant to specific statutory timeframes that prevent delay tactics from financially crippling projects

- Projects that require federal approvals would be expedited significantly if all such reviews were consolidated in a single appellate proceeding

- Federal investment incentives for long lead time renewable energy projects are typically put in place for time periods far shorter than the time required for permitting, environmental review and construction

Frank DeRosa, senior vice president for project development at First Solar, commended federal officials for making progress in some areas of review for projects on federal lands, but he cited one policy gap.

Federal environmental standards are enforceable on private lands, but at an apparently much slower pace. “If a proposed solar project on private land has the potential to adversely affect a listed (endangered) species or critical habitat, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service requires the solar developer to prepare a Habitat Conservation Plan,” he said. “Unfortunately, for projects with no Federal nexus (Federal funding, license or permit) under the current process it can take from three to five years to receive the required permits versus four to six months to complete the permitting process for either projects on Federal land or with a Federal nexus. As a result, projects with no Federal nexus are typically abandoned or not undertaken at all.”

But all the policy streamlining in the world won’t fix the project development gap if other federal incentives aren’t extended or made semi-permanent in the tax code, the renewable energy industry maintains.

 "Developers face many hurdles in bringing a solar project to fruition, whether on public or private lands. Our industry needs stable, predictable policies for continued growth,” said Rhone Resch, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association.

The lapse of the Section 1603 Treasury grant program at the end of this year and the projected end of the production tax credit in 2012 are just two examples.

“Given lead times for project development, it is important to act now to avoid a lull in development post-2012. Business decisions for 2013 are already being made,” said Roby Roberts, representing the American Wind Energy Association.

And at the pace of legislation in the current stalemated Congress, prospects for quick action are questionable, at best.


 

Related Topics

Comments

Delay in Renewable Energy Projects launching

I agree with you Bill Opalka. But Renewable Energy Projects gestation period is small. Thermal Power Projects takes years for inauguration as number of clearances are needed before the sanction of the projects. One American Cynic commented," You Indian Guys are better than Bill Gates in Cleating Windows"!

Dr.A.Jagadeesh  Nellore(AP),India

Wind Energy Expert

E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com

welcome to Gubbmint

Waaa, waaaa, waa. These are the exact same hurdles that prevent development of any and all energy resources whether on public or private lands in the U.S.  And the inability to accurately predict when/if all regulatory approvals for any given project will be granted keeps potential investors sitting on the sidelines, Until there is meaningful legal reform and some limits placed on the ability of NGO's to bring endless suit after suit against energy development projects whether oil and gas drilling, mining (coal, uranium), hydropower, solar or other so-called renewables we will continue to face rapidly escalating energy costs and shortages in this country. Politicians who blindly do the bidding of the enormously powerful "environmental" groups (a misnomer, if ever there was one- they are all about power, not protecting the environment) are helping bring industry in the U.S. to its knees. And ultimately all of us pay the price. Who elected/annointed NGO's to run the world? This is shadow government at its worst.