Coal Has Potential, Says GAO

Barry Cassell | Nov 29, 2012


Retirements of older units, retrofits of existing units with pollution controls, and the construction of some new coal-fueled units are expected to significantly change the coal-fired generating fleet, making it capable of emitting lower levels of pollutants than the current fleet but reducing its capacity.

That is according to a recent report done by the Government Accountability Office that looks at the coal-fired power industry and the impacts of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency initiatives that are impacting the viability of many coal plants. The report was prepared for Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

“Two broad trends are affecting power companies' decisions related to coal-fueled generating units -- recent environmental regulations and changing market conditions, such as the recent decrease in the price of natural gas,” GAO wrote. “Regarding retirements, forecasts GAO reviewed based on current policies project that power companies may retire 15 to 24 percent of coal-fueled generating capacity by 2035 - an amount consistent with GAO's analysis.”

GAO's statistical analysis, examining data on power companies that have announced plans to retire coal units, found that these companies are more likely to retire units that are older, smaller, and more polluting. For example, the units companies plan to retire emitted an average of twice as much SO2 per unit of fuel used in 2011 as units that companies do not plan to retire.

Based on the characteristics of the units companies plan to retire, GAO estimated additional capacity that may retire. In total, GAO identified 15% to 18% of coal-fueled capacity that power companies either plan to retire or that GAO estimated may retire, which is an amount consistent with the forecasts GAO reviewed.

Regarding retrofits, the coal-fueled fleet may also become less polluting in the future as power companies install controls on many remaining units. New coal-fueled units are likely to be less polluting as they must incorporate advanced technologies to reduce emissions of regulated pollutants.

“Coal-fueled capacity may decline in the future as less capacity is expected to be built than is expected to retire,” GAO noted, which is pretty much the understatement of the year considering the dozens of coal-fired plants targeted for retirement and the handful either planned or in construction.

According to stakeholders and three long-term forecasts GAO reviewed, coal is generally expected to remain a key fuel source for U.S. electricity generation in the future, but coal's share as a source of electricity may continue to decline.

For example, in a forecast based on current policies, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) forecasts that the amount of electricity generated using coal is expected to remain relatively constant through 2035, but it forecasts that the share of coal-fueled generation will decline from 42% in 2011 to 38% in 2035.

GAO notes that EIA thinks coal will remain viable

“Available information suggests that the future U.S. use of coal may be determined by several key factors, including the price of natural gas and environmental regulations,” GAO noted.

“For example, available information suggests that the price of coal compared with other fuel sources will influence how economically attractive it is to use coal to generate electricity. EIA assessed several scenarios of future fuel prices and forecasts that coal's share of U.S. electricity generation will fall to 30 percent in 2035 if natural gas prices are low or 40 percent if natural gas prices are high.

In addition, some stakeholders told GAO that the future use of coal could be significantly affected if existing environmental regulations become more stringent or if additional environmental regulations are issued. For example, EIA forecasts that two hypothetical future policies that reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the electricity sector by 46 percent and 76 percent would result in coal's share of U.S. electricity generation falling to 16 and 4 percent in 2035, respectively.”

In 2011, 1,387 coal-fueled units produced about 42% of the nation's electricity, GAO pointed out. After decades of growth, U.S. coal production and consumption have fallen lately, primarily due to declines in the use of coal to generate electricity.

Barry Cassell is chief analyst for coal generation at GenerationHub, a unit of Energy Central

Related Topics


The tricky strategy !

The coal to natural gas switching strategy!


This strategy is largely conditioned by the fact that, undoubtedly, coal at time of burning is releasing about double the CO2 emissions in comparison to gas burning. What I call the "post-combustion" issue.

But, what about the "pre-combustion" issue, in a "Life Cycle Assessment", as it should logically be seen this matter, if really we have to bother about CO2 emissions to the troposphere?


Strangely enough, none or only very few informed people are considering this issue and even the famous UN-IPCC is not considering, accounting and charging to anybody the usual and huge CO2 emissions coming from the hydrocarbons wells extraction, where CO2 (together with H2S and N20) - naturally present underground, commingled with Methane and other gases - are coming out from ground during the fuels extraction.

These "nasty" ancillary gases (CO2, H2S, N20, etc.) are just regularly locally "captured" during wells extraction and then simply "vented" to the atmosphere!

In addition to the above mentioned "nasty" gases, there is also the "Methane fugitive emissions" issue to take into account and in relation to same I think useful to attract your and Mr. Dieter Helm's attention to the attached Study, published last year by the Cornell University - Ithaca/NY (USA): "Methane and GHG footprint of natural Gas from shale formation".


IT is now time to investigate into this topic and inform people of the actual reality. At least one third of the natural gas deposits worldwide are known for having a very large C02 content. So, the more natural gas is extracted, the more CO2 is emitted/vented to the atmosphere. To this direct CO2 emissions you have to also add the "Methane Fugitive Emissions from both conventional and unconventional gas fields. 


Considering the importance that many people are placing to the above policy: "i.e.: switching from coal to natural gas for power production", I think that this matter need to be better understood and examined, to avoid that a wrong policy/action negatively influence so much the energy sector, worldwide at a very huge cost for the consumers.



The GAO stated that 42 new coal-fired power plants [21.6 GW] are planned. Assuming extension of current regulatory scrutiny of new coal-fired plants, do not expect to see a significant number of permits issued. Both owners of existing and new coal-fired plants are faced with a myriad of regulations embedded with uncertainty. Making business decisions for future growth will be hindered by the hazy regulatory maze.

Richard W. Goodwin West Palm Beach FL


Coal has the potential to cause more harm!

The only potential that coal has is to punish children who act bad and find a lump of it in their stocking!  While it's true that the emmissions from burning coal can be cleaned up somewhat, this article neglects to point out that is that even with scrubbers, that coal still does ALL KINDS OF DAMAGE to the environment!

From it's mining, which destroys the land and pollutes the water to the fly ash that remains after you burn coal and that causes all kinds of problems, there is nothing about coal that is clean!

It's time to accept reality and that reality is that coal has had it's day and it's time to move on to cleaner, better forms of energy!


Bob "The Clean Energy Guy" Mitchell