The Gas Cliff


The fiscal cliff is getting a lot of attention lately.

Fewer are paying attention to the gas cliff.

Simply put, we are becoming increasingly reliant on natural gas to generate power in this country. That is a good thing, the result of ample shale resources that are now being exploited. It is moderating consumer electricity bills and home heating bills. It is also shrinking our nation’s carbon footprint.

Just a few months ago, the United States for the first time generated more power by burning gas than burning coal.

Tom Fanning, the head of Southern Company, has on several occasions pointed out that his company along with others is using gas to generate a growing share of its power. But Southern, he said, is also building the first new nuclear power plants in decades – and it is also pursuing cleaner coal-burning technology.

He and others have said that the surest path to rapidly escalating gas prices is for everyone to act as if gas prices will never rise.

You can now add to the combustible mix of gas uncertainties the prospect of rising exports of natural gas from America.

A study for the Department of Energy, just released, said the economic gains from such exports outweigh the danger of boosting gas prices for consumers and gas-dependent industries.

The New York Times today reported that 15 proposed liquefied natural gas export terminals would have a combined capacity of 26.5 billion cubic feet a day – one-third of the volume of gas consumed in the country today.

Some say it is unlikely that all of the proposed new LNG export facilities will be built.

But who is willing to argue that is a certainty when there is a huge price disparity between the cost of gas in America and in an energy-starved developing world?

Who will bet their business on an assumption that exporting as much as one-third of the gas we need today will not have a huge disruptive effect?

EnergyBiz magazine in its upcoming January issue will talk with chief executive officers of six natural gas utilities about these and related issues.

The EnergyBiz Leadership Forum, “Strategies for a Radically New Utility Universe,” March 18-19 in Washington, will explore the broad strategic and business implications of the shale gas revolution – with Tom Fanning and many others.




Field trips to
1 Austin Decker Creek natural gas fired generating station
2 Webberville solar project
3 Sweetwater and Roscoe TX wind projects
December 23-30, 2012 with pics, vids, links and text.

We're investigating:

fast neutron
Santa Fe, NM
January 12, 2009

From actual experience, wind farms produce 1.2 watts per square meter. Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic methods capture 5 to 6 watts per square meter. There is no economy of size in either technology. Dividing the watts you need by those values gives the land area in square meters needed to produce the juice. The numbers are astronomical

[Bill's post just before fast neutron's may have caused above post? :)]
bill payne

Having spent my career of 40 years in a process of energy generation engineering, starting with nuclear (CANDU) and passing through biomass to coal gasification and currently LNG and coal gasification I like to recall the optimism about nuclear power from the early 1970's. It crashed, then in the 80's we were very excited about coal gasification then oil shale retorting. For the past 20 years a huge number of gas fired turbines have been built. Then while we were seeing gas prices spike with deregulation we again pursued gasification. All the while environmental laws have continued advancing as detection equipment and public information sources have ramped up. The financial community has become increasingly driven by usury and lending fueled by low interest rates and most of our big projects are financed by derivatives. The end game is near as we are converging to a stasis where demand will simply not be met and the quality of life in general will stagnate and recede. No matter what we do technologically the stagnation due to confused priorities economically will stifle real growth. With the slippage in services as already noted in China and India, laregly dur to corruption and economic lunacy there has come a retardation of investment in primary industry. Political power is at a standstill and the economic giants are $708 trillion in debt. I recommend we plan on a flat growth picture for the long term for all energy sources.
Harry Gatley

Want more news and insights? Sign up for a FREE industry newsletter